FDA gets green light to post inspectors in China
The US State Department has given its Food and Drug Administration (FDA) permission to place eight of its inspectors in China, as part of a drive to strengthen ties between the two countries and help ensure that any food and medicines exported are safe. The Chinese government has given approval for the FDA to employ and place its staff in the country over the next 18 months, as well as hire five local Chinese nationals to work with the new FDA staff at the US Embassy in Beijing and the US Consulates General in Shanghai and Guangzhou.
Chinese exports of pharmaceuticals to the USA have doubled in the last five years; however, there have been a significant number of fake or substandard products entering the country. According to the FDA, the permanent postings in China will make it easier for inspections to be carried out and will ease relationships between inspectors and manufacturers, to help assure that products shipped to the US meet its standards for safety and manufacturing.
“In an age when a border is not a barrier, the globalised economy demands nothing less than heightened regulatory interoperability, information exchange, and cooperation, especially on product quality and enforcement matters,” explained Murray Lumpkin, deputy commissioner for International and Special Programs at the agency, and he said that “efforts to fill permanent FDA positions in China are a significant step toward ensuring access to safe food, drugs, and medical devices in the global market”.
Meanwhile, China’s State Food and Drug Administration is reportedly working closely with the FDA to root out the cause of serious adverse events linked to Baxter’s blood-thinner heparin in the US. Earlier this year, Baxter was forced to temporarily suspend production of heparin at its plant in China following an increase in serious allergic reactions and low blood pressure in patients receiving high ‘bolus’ doses of the drug, which has been linked with 19 patient deaths. According to the FDA, a contaminant has been identified that may be linked to the drug’s problems. Although it remains unclear at what stage the contamination took place, reports emerged earlier this year that the facility in China where the blood-thinning agent is produced has not been inspected by US regulators. (18 March 2008, Pharma Times online)
EU launches public consultation on counterfeit drugs
The European Commission has launched a public consultation on the dangers of counterfeit drugs, and is asking all stakeholders and interested parties to submit key ideas for regulatory reform by May 9.
Counterfeit medicines have become an increasing threat for patients, healthcare professionals and the industry, and a concern for European Union and national policymakers, says the Commission. In particular, it notes the following “worrying” trends: a sharp increase in seized fake medicines at EU customs borders; the counterfeiting of life-saving drugs; targeting by counterfeiters of the “classical” supply chain; and a “blurred line” between counterfeit and substandard active substances in medicines.
This growing problem may have been facilitated by deficiencies in supply chain integrity, says the Commission, noting that there is “uncertainty as to whether certain participants in the distribution chain (e.g. brokers, traders, business-to-business platforms) are subject to pharmaceutical legislation.” It also cites: a lack of transparency as to whether wholesalers and others in the distribution chain comply with Good Distribution Practice (GDP); shortcomings in product integrity, especially when packs are opened for repackaging and changed for relabeling purposes; difficulties in conducting targeted recalls, especially for counterfeits; legal uncertainty and differing practices between EU member states concerning the application of legislation to “imports for the purpose of export;” and the fact that active substances may not be manufacturing in compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards, at declared sites and in accordance with declared procedures.
In addition, member states are starting to consider taking unilateral actions to address these problems, and while the Commission acknowledges that these are motivated by justifiable concerns, it warns that they may create issues of compatibility with EU internal market rules. These varying approaches may also lead to different levels of protection for public health and safety, it adds, and cautions: “indirectly, this kind of way forward could encourage counterfeiters to target member states with lower levels of protection of the legal distribution chain.” Therefore, “the EU must act firmly.”
The EU’s plans to prioritise and speed up moves to tackle counterfeits were first announced in January, when Commission Vice President Guenter Verheugen told Parliament that the initial findings of a study into drug distribution had shown that parallel imports pose a “considerable” risk for patient safety for “numerous” reasons.
The consultation – to be conducted by the Commission’s Directorate-General (DG) Enterprise and Industry, which is headed by Commissioner Verheugen and has responsibility for the pharmaceutical industry – will focus on the manufacture and marketing of active substances and finished medicines, plus related inspections, and on the import, export and transhipment of drugs. Improvements to the regulatory framework in these areas could make a “real contribution” to protecting patients, it says.
As a result of the Commission’s concerns, there has been a major change to the DG’s work programme, and it plans to introduce legislative proposals after the summer break.
The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) welcomed the consultation, pointing out that the Commission’s findings corroborate its own evidence on prevalence of counterfeits, including the increasing penetration in the EU legitimate supply chain.
As long as repackaging and breaking of seals in the distribution chain is allowed, patient safety will be highly at risk, says the EFPIA, which is calling for: a ban on repackaging; clearly defined liabilities for all involved in the distribution chain (including brokers, traders and agents); stricter auditing rules and controls of the supply chain; and penalties for trafficking in counterfeits.
The industry is investing in anti-counterfeiting technologies to enhance product security, and the EFPIA plans to launch a pilot project in the area of mass serialization (2D barcoding system) towards the end of this year, it adds.
DG Enterprise and Industry is calling for responses to the consultation to be sent by e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org by 9 May 2008
(17 March 2008, Pharma Times online)
MHRA and RPSGB link arms to boost medicines safety
The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (RPSGB) and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) have agreed to work closer together to help promote the safe use of medicines in the UK. The groups signed a Memorandum of Understanding earlier this week to help them achieve certain objectives and seal their working relationship, which, they say, will be “characterised by regular ongoing contact and open exchange of information”. The move is designed to help the organisations pool resources and draw on each other’s considerable expertise and, under the new working relationship, they also plan to organise joint training for inspectors and undertake joint investigations where appropriate. The two organisations already work closely on some projects – for example, the RPSGB working group, set up to consider issues regarding the supply of medicines by online pharmacies, includes MHRA representatives. (6 March 2008, Pharma Times online).